Most Admired Man Vote was Fixed: Obama

Former President Barack Obama announced today he is filing a formal protest for a vote recount of the December 29th Gallup Poll naming President Donald Trump as the Most Admired Man of 2020.

According to Gallup, President Trump beat out former President Obama 18% to 15% in a national poll conducted Dec 1-Dec 17 asking the question, “What man that you have heard or read about, living today in any part of the world, do you admire most?”

At a peaceful protest by Antifa and Black Lives Matter, Obama’s lawyers cited a wide range of voting irregularities during the poll tabulation, including suspicious mail-in ballots originating from drop boxes at Trump hotel properties, dead people voting, and the physical obstruction of Obama ballot watchers watching the counting by Russian mercenaries disguised as Georgia Democrat Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock.

“In one of the most glaring examples of election fraud in this sham poll, Gallup voting was ostensibly halted the evening votes were being tabulated because of a water leak,” Obama spokesperson Chance Makers said. “Within hours we learned that the alleged problem was really just a toilet leak in the outhouse of Gallup headquarters.”

Makers also said Obama’s legal team has collected film footage of fixed polling results being hauled out from under tables after the room had been evacuated. The ballots were allegedly run through a tabulating machine several times that according to the Obama team is wirelessly connected with a web server at Proud Boys headquarters.

The server in question allegedly stored Obama votes before they were surreptiously switched to Trump using a sophisticated algorithm involving Biden syntax and Trump tweets.

Thanks for reading Dean Riffs. Welcome to all those who love American liberty, free enterprise, and who believe God has blessed our country. 
Photo source: FidoSysop

Copyright 2021, Dean A. George©

The Bias of Today’s “Political Experts”

To say that Republican presidents historically poll poorly with “political experts” is no surprise considering such wunderkinds think that “leading from behind” was a serious foreign policy and “Cash for Clunkers” helped save the U.S. auto industry and Planet Earth.

Last week during Presidents’ Day week the “Never Put America First” New York Times published survey results ranking American presidents.

Naturally those rankings from greatest president to worst rankled conservatives and anyone else with a political IQ higher than their shoe size.

The NYT surveyed 170 members of the American Political Science Association (APSA) and their “experts” listed President Trump as the worst president in American history.

On the bright side, it is the first time since the election that liberals have listed Trump first in anything. Baby steps.

Here are three reasons why the survey results made no sense:

  1. Trump was sworn in as President just 13 months ago. Judging the performance of a president at the quarter mile mark of a four-year term would be like giving college students a one-hour time limit on an exam, collecting their work 15 minutes after the test started and counting wrong all their unanswered questions.

Considering the headwinds this president has encountered from Democrats, their PR flaks in the mainstream media and all the mutinous denizens of the D.C. swamp, his accomplishments in just one year are incredible.

2. ASPA bills itself as the leading organization for the study of political science and numbers more than 12,000 members in dozens of countries.

Considering that three percent of their surveyed dweeps said that Washington, Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt should be included next on Mt. Rushmore (ahem, they already are), this “expert” organization may want to use ringers from different countries on the next survey.

I’d suggest maybe starting with Russia since they seem to know a lot about American politics and have a history of colluding with Democrats.

3. Aside from their blatant bias and questionable metrics, there are other irregularities in the group’s survey results that are lacking in logic and commonsense. For example:

  • Why did Barack Obama climb from 18th to 8th in greatness from 2014 – 2018? Should we assume it’s because he wasn’t in the Oval Office for over a year? In other words, the longer time away he is from the levers of power, the greater his awesomeness?
  • William Henry Harrison dropped three slots from 39 – 42. Harrison spent just one month in office before dying of pneumonia in 1841. Why was he considered a bad president considering he didn’t serve long enough to mess anything up? And what changed that he was voted even worse than four years ago? Was it because he didn’t get a pneumonia shot?
  • George W. Bush jumped five slots from 35 – 30. My personal theory is that’s because “Dubya” wasn’t caught sending plane loads of cash to help fund Iranian hegemony and terrorism and didn’t illegally use America’s intelligence agencies to influence a presidential election.

Good thing for Obama this is the 21st century. If he’d sent millions in cash to an enemy state in the 19th century he conceivably would have been tarred and feathered at best or punished as a traitor at worst.

But this is today so he keeps his pension, his Secret Service detail and is free to collect ungodly speaking fees from anywhere in the world – even from Russia!

And George Bush is ranked less odious by political historians. A win-win.

Final thought: Critiquing the historical legacy of any administration months after a president leaves office is absurd.  Judging that same legacy while a president still occupies the Oval Office is insane.

  • Thanks for reading Dean Riffs. Welcome to those who love American liberty, free enterprise, and who believe God has blessed our country. For those who believe in open borders, safe spaces, and who think free speech is hate speech, move on – there’s nothing here for you to see.

    Source: dailysignal.com, newyorktimes.com, sps.boisestate.edu

    Photo sources: today.law.harvard.edu, mubi.com, youtube.com, c-span.org

     

    Copyright 2018, Dean A. George©

Getting the Picture of Obama’s Presidency

They say every picture tells a story. If that’s true, the official presidential portrait of former president Barack Obama released Monday at the National Portrait Gallery is reminiscent of one of those Choose Your Own Adventure books.

Why is Potus #44 immersed in green foliage and flowers with a resolute look on his face? Shouldn’t he be seated behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office with a majestic look befitting the god-man who pledged to stem the rise of the oceans and heal the planet?

The portrait artist was personally selected by Obama, so it seems unlikely that the green foliage is meant to symbolize all the marijuana that young Barry Soetoro smoked as a member of his Choom Gang in high school.

Maybe the green background is meant to epitomize the Green Movement that grew like a weed under the stewardship of Obama’s rogue EPA?

Could it represent the Green Revolution that Obama snuffed out when he ignored the Iranian students protesting for freedoms early in his first term when he sided with the mullah hardliners instead?

And what’s with the flowers? If they were pansies and lilies the portrait might make more sense as representative of Obama’s leading from behind foreign policy.

To be honest visitors viewing the portrait in the gallery may see it as a giant Rorschach test made by Walt Disney.

Of course, if the artist wanted to really portray Obama’s fraudulent, clandestine behavior during his two terms, they may have wanted to do something like this:

Whatever the artist’s intent, the animated caricature looking down on Smithsonian visitors will be a symbolic portrayal of what current and future conservatives will always view as a cartoon presidency.

Thanks for reading Dean Riffs. Welcome to those who love American liberty, free enterprise, and who believe God has blessed our country. For those who believe in open borders, safe spaces, and who think free speech is hate speech, move on – there’s nothing here for you to see.

Source: whitehousedossier.com, washingtontimes.com, dailysignal.com, cnn.com

Copyright 2018, Dean A. George©

Back to Top