![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.deanriffs.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Clouseau-and-Parrot.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Or what about this comedy clue?\u00a0 How about an investigation\/setup well into its second year that is looking for collusion between a presidential campaign and Russia where the only person in that campaign allegedly not under investigation <\/span><\/strong><\/a>is the candidate (now president) himself.<\/p>\n One more believe-it-or-not example.\u00a0 What’s the first thing the FBI would normally do when informed that a political party’s email servers were hacked?\u00a0 Do a forensic inspection of the compromised server<\/span><\/strong><\/a>?\u00a0 Wrong.<\/p>\n The correct answer is to sit like a trained poodle while a private third party hired by the Democrats “analyzes” the data before pointing their finger at the foreign power accused of colluding with the Deep State’s political opponent.<\/p>\n All without any shared empirical evidence and based on “primary attribution analysis” the private company that did the forensics admits is “shoddy.”<\/p>\n Even better, the hacked party crying foul refuses to allow the pre-eminent law enforcement agency in the world, the FBI, access to their server – even two years after the purported hack!<\/p>\n And what does the FBI do when denied access to the “hacked” server?\u00a0 Revisiting our poodle analogy, they bark up the wrong tree by investigating the opposing candidate of the “hacked” party rather than do forensics on the hardware that would prove the actual culprit.<\/p>\n So let’s recap: $17 million taxpayer dollars have been spent looking everywhere<\/span><\/strong><\/a> – everywhere except on the computer hardware where the alleged crime was committed.\u00a0 If it was committed.\u00a0 We really don’t know since the Democrats won’t let anyone look at their servers.<\/p>\n Without a crime being named and absolutely no evidence, a Special Counsel was appointed based on an illegal leak by terminated FBI director James Comey.\u00a0 Comey was angered at being fired by a president he loathes and who beat the candidate the Deep State supported – not to mention that his wife and daughters wanted to win!<\/p>\n Comey used opposition research that he knew was provided by Hillary Clinton then lied with others before a FISA court about knowing its source.<\/p>\n The oppo research material consisted of illegal domestic spying (informanting?), and a dossier, which itself was based on information gathered by a British intelligence officer using Russian Kremlin officials as sources.<\/p>\n This would be the same Russia that Trump was accused of colluding with to steal the 2016 presidential election.<\/p>\n Sound like a convoluted political novel by former Obama Administration speechwriter and Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes<\/span><\/strong><\/a>?<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.deanriffs.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Three-Stooges.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.deanriffs.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/Clouseau-is-the-Bomb.jpg\")
<\/p>\n